News

Colombian military ‘false positives’ scandal: ‘Nobody listened to us’ | Information Information

On a Tuesday morning in March 2008, Eduardo Garzon failed to point out up for his job at a working-class restaurant that he co-managed in Bogota, Colombia. His whereabouts remained unknown for the subsequent 5 months till his mom found Garzon had died 300 kilometres (186 miles) away from their dwelling in an alleged confrontation with the army.

Official experiences that claimed Garzon was a harmful insurgent with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) in the end unravelled one of many worst human rights abuses in Colombian historical past often called the “false positives” scandal, by which army officers executed and falsely represented younger civilian males as enemy combatants.

Greater than a decade later, a transitional peace courtroom concluded that Garzon and greater than 6,400 different civilians have been extrajudicially killed by the Colombian military between 2002 and 2008. The figures exceeded the quantity beforehand reported by the federal government by nearly threefold.

“We’ve all the time stated there are extra victims than they are saying there are, however nobody listened to us,” stated Ana Paez, Garzon’s mom and vice chairman of the organisation Mom of False Constructive Victims in Soacha and Bogota.

“They are saying there are greater than 6,400 victims, however we believe there are extra.”

Ana Paez, mom of Eduardo Garzon, urges retired basic Mario Montoya to inform the reality throughout his testimony earlier than the JEP [Christina Noriega/Al Jazeera]

The Particular Peace Jurisdiction (JEP), a courtroom arrange by the 2016 peace deal, is making an attempt atrocities associated to greater than 50 years of armed battle in Colombia. Whereas experiences of extrajudicial killings return a long time, the JEP has discovered that these circumstances peaked between 2002 and 2008, through the administration of former President Alvaro Uribe.

The findings contradicted a 2018 report launched by the Legal professional Common’s Workplace that discovered a complete of two,248 circumstances of extrajudicial killing dedicated between 1988 and 2014.

‘Proving us proper’

Human rights teams have argued for years that the observe of army members killing and falsely representing civilians as enemy combatants was extra broadly unfold than the Colombian authorities acknowledged.

“We’re glad that the JEP has recognised the magnitude of this example, however we’re additionally involved that the Legal professional Common’s Workplace has hid greater than two-thirds of crimes and their perpetrators,” stated Alberto Yepes, a lawyer with the Colombia-United States-Europe Coordination (CCEEU), a coalition representing 281 rights teams.

The CCEEU reported at the least 5,763 circumstances between 2002 to 2010 to the JEP final yr. A 2018 report, compiled with official sources and impartial analysis, estimated that greater than 10,000 civilians have been murdered throughout this identical interval.

“The JEP is proving us proper,” stated Omar Rojas Bolanos, co-author of the 2018 examine.

“In the event that they proceed to analyze, the nation shall be shocked [at what they find out].”

Throughout Mario Montoya’s testimony to the JEP, activist protest outdoors holding indicators that say 5,673 civilians have been killed [Christina Noriega/Al Jazeera]

The Legal professional Common’s Workplace stated they have been reviewing their newest figures from 2018.

“The figures reported are from the earlier administration of Nestor Humberto Martinez, not the present administration,” stated Paola Tomas, a spokesperson for the Legal professional Common’s Workplace. “We’re checking the numbers and determining what’s occurring.”

The Ministry of Defence questioned the supply of those new figures, to which the JEP responded that it had compiled data from the Legal professional Common’s Workplace, the Inspector Common’s Workplace, the Nationwide Heart for Historic Reminiscence and the CCEEU.

The surge in “false optimistic” circumstances in 2002 coincided with an incentives programme created by the Uribe administration that incentivised fight kills with holidays, promotions and army coaching overseas. Inflated physique counts, produced by these extrajudicial executions, helped Uribe help claims that the army marketing campaign in opposition to the FARC would quickly be gained and justified billion-dollar US assist packages.

“The figures present that this couldn’t have been the work of simply low and mid-ranking troopers,” stated Yepes. “The JEP reveals that 78 p.c of circumstances passed off underneath the administration of Alvaro Uribe. Which means that they both ordered the crimes perpetrated or that they knew that they have been occurring.”

Calling for duty

Human rights teams have known as on Uribe to seem earlier than the JEP. Former President Juan Manuel Santos, Uribe’s minister of defence from 2006 to 2009, can also be being urged to testify. Santos acquired a Nobel Peace Prize for facilitating the 2016 peace deal.

In a Twitter publish final week, Uribe disputed the courtroom findings and alleged the courtroom meant to break his popularity. He additionally defended himself in opposition to accusations that blamed his heavy-handed safety insurance policies for the surge in killings throughout his presidency.

“No army individual can say they’ve ever acquired a foul instance or improper insinuations from me,” the publish learn.

Jose Miguel Vivanco, Americas director of Human Rights Watch, accused Uribe of distorting the reality in his Twitter thread, and supplied proof that contradicted Uribe’s claims that he prioritised captures over fight kills throughout his presidency.

A part of the JEP’s duties is investigating how excessive inside the army ranks and within the authorities data or duty for these crimes went. The JEP is authorised to grant army members underneath investigation by the Legal professional Common’s Workplace advantages, together with conditional freedom and lighter sentences, for contributing to the reality.

But, human rights organisations are involved that there could also be a “pact of silence” amongst army members to hide who ordered the execution of civilians. In early February, the Nationwide Motion for State Crime Victims criticised attorneys who’re instructing army members to keep away from mentioning military commanders.

The best-ranking official to seem earlier than the transitional courtroom, retired Common Mario Montoya, testified final yr that insubordinate troopers have been answerable for the crimes. He denied any involvement or data of the executions that occurred throughout his tenure as military commander from 2006 to 2008.

Some victims’ attorneys, like German Romero, consider the JEP’s “bottom-up” strategy to its investigation, specializing in middle-ranking army officers earlier than the high-ranking officers, is flawed as a result of it follows the identical technique taken by the federal government.

Ladies whose relations have been killed by the army in “false optimistic” executions current a report back to the JEP [Christina Noriega/Al Jazeera]

“The JEP is repeating what the Legal professional Common’s Workplace has already completed and listening to those that have already been accused or convicted,” stated Romero.

Whereas the Legal professional Common’s Workplace has convicted a whole bunch of rank-and-file troopers, it has but to accuse a basic of involvement within the “false positives” killings.

“The JEP has a 10-year mandate, of which three years have already handed,” stated Yepes. “At this charge, we predict it’s tough that they’ll attain the utmost accountable within the army management.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button